Abstract
The study was conducted in different areas of Charsadda to compare the nutritional status of breastfed and formula-fed children aged 0 to 2 years. The data was collected from 100 children, 25 boys and 25 girls who were breastfed and 25 boys and 25 girls who were formula fed. A questionnaire was used to collect data on the patients' socio-demographic characteristics, anthropometric characteristics, symptoms, feeding practises, and dietary intake. The mean age of breastfed and formula fed subjects was 12.445.15 (months) and 13.905.86 (months), respectively (months). Some (10.0 percent) of the breast-fed subjects and the majority (58.0 percent) of the formula-fed subjects were discarded. Some (24.0%) of the breast-fed subjects and the majority (56.0%) of the formula-fed subjects were stunted. According to BMI for percentile of the subjects, the majority of breastfed (72.0 percent) and some formula fed (16.0 percent) subjects were normal. Some breastfed (16.0 percent) and most formula fed (76.0 percent) subjects had diarrhoea.
Key Words
Underweight, Wasted, Stunted, Breast Fed, Formula Fed
Introduction
Breast feeding is an encouraging and conventional method of furnishing a new born child with basic supplements that in return helps the baby in growth and development and improvement. It is recommended that breast feeding should be started within an hour after the child birth. The recommended method of feeding infants is breastfeeding, and Healthy People 2010 aims to increase the number of mothers in the United States who breastfeed their infants at six months of age. Breastfeeding has been associated with mental capacity and academic performance [Schultz et al., 2006].
Growth patterns differ between breastfed and bottle fed infants, and at 12 months, breastfed infants weigh 400-600g more than breastfed infants. Body composition changes rapidly and indirectly during the first year of life, so comparisons between individual studies based on postnatal age, in which measurements
are also made, are important [Gail et al., 2012].
In Pakistan, the birth weight of a newborn is below the average weight than in other countries. The main reason for this is socioeconomic factors, cultural and educational background of the parents. Discarding colostrums and delayed initiation of breastfeeding is common in many communities. Various misconceptions regarding diet among breastfeeding mothers are also responsible. Mother’s diet directly affects the quantity and quality of breast milk, which in turn affects the baby. Many mothers either chose not to breastfeed or avoid certain diet. Anecdotal evidence suggests that mothers avoid strongly flavored foods as it may change the taste of their milk. However, fetuses swallow amniotic fluid during pregnancy, so they are accustomed to a variety of taste and may enjoy breast milk flavors. The food restriction among breastfeeding mothers lacks an evidence base and is culturally driven, e.g. Asian mothers avoid cold foods, Hispanic mothers avoid pork, chilies and tomatoes and Korean mothers avoid spicy food while many others avoid cow’s milk as these are considered harmful for the breastfeeding infants. Although there are some nutritional guidelines for breastfeeding mothers, many cultural traditions had no scientific basis and based on popular myths in the community [Sethi et al., 2007].
Exclusive breast feed is recommended up to 6 months of ages, no other food should be given to the child up to 6 months of age other then only vitamin D can be provided through sunlight. After proper exclusive breast feed the breast milk can be continued up to two years of age. According to global breast feeding scorecard only 4 out of 10 of the infants are breast fed exclusively by providing nothing else than breast milk [Victora et al., 2016].
On the other hand in Pakistan only 2 out of 10 of the mother initiated in first hour of birth whereas only 37% of the mothers continued it up to 6 month of age, whereas rest of them are formula feed [UNICEF. 2009].
This research was aimed to emphasize the importance of breast feeding and formula feeding among the children of Charsadda. This research will expose nutritional status of breast feeding and formula feeding childrens in the rural and urban areas of Charsadda. Through this research the significance among the cases under study will help the Health Department and other organization to focus on the issues arising from these practices among mothers and their children. The government will also plan their policies for the health of the mothers and their children.
Methodology
Site of Study
The study was carried out at different areas of Charsadda to compare the nutritional status of breast fed child with formula fed child between 0-2 years of age.
Design of Study
The research was conducted through a community-based cross-sectional study. The data was collected from 100 normal children that consisted of 25 boys and 25 girls being breast fed whereas 25 boys and 25 girls being formula fed.
Data Collection
The data was collected in three different phases. In the first phase data regarding socio demographic status and birth history of the child was collected from their mothers. In the 2nd phase of the data collection the type of feeding was assessed while in the third and the last phase data regarding anthropometric characteristics and clinical complication was evaluated. A pre-planned questionnaire was used for this purpose to collect data on social demographics, anthropometric features, clinical signs and symptoms, and feeding methods.
Statistical Analysis
All of the data was entered into social science statistical software (SPSS version 21). Descriptive statistics were used to determine the frequencies of various variables, and the mean of continuous variables was calculated using a simple mean and an independent t-test. The ANOVA test was used to determine association. At (p0.05), the entire test will be considered significant.
Result and Discussion
The current study compared the nutritional status of breastfed children to that of formula-fed children in various rural and urban areas of District Charsadda. The study came to the following conclusions:> >Socio Demographic Features of the Subjects>Table 1 shows the socio-demographic characteristics of breastfed and formula-fed subjects. All variables of socio-demographic characteristics of both subjects showed a non-significant difference (p>0.05). The average age of breastfed and formula fed subjects was 12.44±5.15 (months) and 13.90±5.86 (months), respectively The mean number of siblings of breast and formula fed subjects was 3.06±1.62 and 2.94±1.80. In the rural area of District Charsadda (56.0%) breast fed while (40.0%) were formula fed. Literacy rate was noticed for breast fed (38.0%) and formula fed (54.0%) for the mothers of the subjects.>On the basis of housewives the mothers for breast fed was (86.0%) while for formula fed it was (68.0%). On the basis of their income, the income of breast feeding mothers were (38.0%) and the income of formula feeding subjects mothers were (48.0%) were enjoying average income for their livelihood. For this research the subjects were selected from urban and rural areas of District Charsadda as per plan in which (56.0%) breast fed and (40.0%) formula fed subjects belonged to rural area. The ratio for the literacy rate of mothers for breast fed (38.0%) and formula fed (54.0%) were also recorded.>The study's findings are consistent with the findings of (Kumar et al., 2006), who conducted a study on the influence of infant-feeding practices on nutritional status of under-five children and discovered that the mean age of breast-fed children was 18.4±17.8months. >These results, on the basis of literacy rate, are in agreement with the research work done by (Dewey et al. 1992), (Dewey et al. 1993) has conducted a study to determine that Breast-fed infants are leaner than formula-fed infants at one year of age and found out that mean age of formula fed child was 9.76±3.12 (months) whereas mothers of formula fed (72.0%) children were uneducated.
>Table 1. Socio Demographic Characteristics of the Subjects border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0" width="100%">
Variables
width="46%" colspan="2">N (%) Mean ± S.D
width="12%" rowspan="3">p-value
Mode of feeding
Breast feed
width="22%">Formula feed
Age (months)
width="23%">12.44±5.15
width="22%">13.90±5.86
width="12%">0.189
Gender
width="20%">Female
width="23%">25 (50)
width="22%">25 (50)
width="12%" rowspan="2">1.000
Male
width="23%">25 (50)
width="22%">25 (50)
No of siblings
width="23%">3.06±1.62
width="22%">2.94±1.80
width="12%">0.727
Locality
width="20%">Rural
width="23%">28 (56.0)
width="22%">20 (40.0)
width="12%" rowspan="2">0.109
Urban
width="23%">22 (44.0)
width="22%">30 (60.0)
Family type
width="20%">Joint
width="23%">30 (60.0)
width="22%">33 (66.0)
width="12%" rowspan="2">0.534
Nuclear
width="23%">20 (40.0)
width="22%">17 (34.0)
Mother education
width="20%">Illiterate
width="23%">19 (38.0)
width="22%">27 (54.0)
width="12%" rowspan="6">0.220
Primary
width="23%">9 (18.0)
width="22%">3 (6.0)
Middle
width="23%">10 (20.0)
width="22%">8 (16.0)
Matriculate
width="23%">1 (2.0)
width="22%">4 (8.0)
Intermediate
width="23%">9 (18.0)
width="22%">6 (12.0)
Graduate
width="23%">2 (4.0)
width="22%">2 (4.0)
Father education
width="20%">Illiterate
width="23%">9 (18.0)
width="22%">15 (30.0)
width="12%" rowspan="6">0.137
Primary
width="23%">4 (8.0)
width="22%">0 (0)
Middle
width="23%">4 (8.0)
width="22%">1 (2.0)
Matriculate
width="23%">13 (26.0)
width="22%">14 (28.0)
Intermediate
width="23%">15 (30.0)
width="22%">12 (24.0)
Graduate
width="23%">5 (10.0)
width="22%">8 (16.0)
Mother job
width="20%">Housewife
width="23%">43 (86.0)
width="22%">34 (68.0)
width="12%" rowspan="2">0.032
Working lady
width="23%">7 (14.0)
width="22%">16 (32.0)
Father job
width="20%">Government
width="23%">24 (48.0)
width="22%">25 (50.0)
width="12%" rowspan="3">0.375
Labor
width="23%">15 (30.0)
width="22%">19 (38.0)
Private
width="23%">11 (22.0)
width="22%">6 (12.0)
Monthly income (Rs)
width="20%">Average
width="23%">19 (38.0)
width="22%">24 (48.0)
width="12%" rowspan="3">0.036
Good
width="23%">16 (32.0)
width="22%">20 (40.0)
Poor
width="23%">15 (30.0)
width="22%">6 (12.0)
Anthropometric Parameters of the Subjects>Anthropometric features of Breastfeed and Formula feed Subjects are shown in Table No 2. A significant difference (p<0.05) was observed for the weight, Head circumference, MUAC, weight for age, height for age, BMI for percentile and BMI for percentile categories. The mean height of Breastfeed and Formula feed Subjects were 68.05±13.97 (cm) and 67.06±11.31 (cm). The mean weight of the Breastfeed and Formula feed Subjects were 9.72±2.63 (kg) and 8.56±2.48 (kg). It was during the study that (10.0%) Breastfeed and (58.0%) Formula feed Subjects were wasted. Stunted growth was observed during study in (24.0%) Breastfeed and (56.0%) Formula feed Subjects. It was also noticed during study that (72.0%) Breastfeed and (16.0%) Formula feed Subjects, were normal according to BMI for percentile of the Subjects.>The findings for wasted, stunted, and BMI for percentile agree with those of (Domelles et al. 2007), who conducted a study on nutritional status, breast feeding, and evaluation of infants with acute viral bronchitis. and found that breast fed children were well nourished (73%) and had normal nutritional status, among them only 10.9% were overweight, whereas 81% of the subjects being undernourished were not exclusively breast fed.>In addition, (Kulwa et al. 2007) conducted a study to assess child-care practises and nutritional status of infants and young children with the goal of improving feeding practises and child nutritional status. and the results shows that formula fed and complementary fed child were stunted (43%), underweight (22%),
>Table 2. Anthropometric Parameters of the Subjects border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0">
Variable
width="237" colspan="2">N (%) Mean± S.D
width="115" rowspan="3">p-value
Mode of feeding
Breast feed
width="133">Formula feed
Height (cm)
width="104">68.05±13.97
width="133">67.06±11.31
width="115">0.696
Weight (kg)
width="104">9.72±2.63
width="133">8.56±2.48
width="115">0.025
MUAC (cm)
width="104">13.14±1.78
width="133">11.96±3.03
width="115">0.019
Head circumference
width="104">30.58±4.80
width="133">25.84±4.79
width="115">0.000
Weight for age
width="83" valign="top">Normal
width="104">35 (70.0)
width="133">10 (20.0)
width="115" rowspan="3">0.000
Overweight
width="104">10 (20.0)
width="133">11 (22.0)
Wasted
width="104">5 (10.0)
width="133">29 (58.0)
Height for age
width="83" valign="top">Normal
width="104">36 (72.0)
width="133">21 (42.0)
width="115" rowspan="3">0.005
Stunted
width="104">12 (24.0)
width="133">28 (56.0)
Taller
width="104">2 (4.0)
width="133">1 (2.0)
BMI for percentile
width="104">45.26 ±13.0
width="133">24.11 ±5.2
width="115">0.000
BMI for percentile categories
width="83" valign="top">Normal
width="104">36 (72.0)
width="133">8 (16.0)
width="115" rowspan="3">0.000
Overweight
width="104">9 (18.0)
width="133">13 (26.0)
Underweight
width="104">5 (10.0)
width="133">29 (58.0)
Clinical Signs and Symptoms of the Subject>Table 3 shows the clinical signs and symptoms of the subjects. In the cases of diarrhoea, dehydration, urination, frequency of diarrhoea, and days of diarrhoea, there was a significant difference (p<0.05). Some of the breast fed (16.0%) whereas most of the formula feed (76.0%) subjects were having diarrhea. Dehydration was common in (8.0%) of the breast fed as well as (86.0%) of the formula fed subjects. Some of the breast fed (12.0%) and majority of the formula fed subjects (72.0%) was having more than 6 times of urination in a day. Most of breast fed (86.0%) and some of the formula fed (6.0%) subjects were having 1 to 3 times of period of diarrhea in a day. Some of breast fed (18.0) and most of the formula feed (52.0%) were having diarrhea for more than 6 days of diarrhea infection.>The study's findings are strongly related to the findings of (Dewey et al. 1995), who conducted a study on the difference in morbidity between breastfed and formula fed infants and concluded that breastfed (9.0 percent) and formula fed (69.0 percent) subjects had diarrhoea. (Chandra et al., 1979) conducted a study on Prospective studies of the effect of breast feeding on the incidence of infection and allergy and discovered that some (5.7 percent) of the breast fed subjects were severely dehydrated, whereas the majority (71 percent) of the formula fed subjects were severely dehydrated..
>Table 4. Clinical Signs and Symptoms of the Subject border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0">
Variable
width="250" colspan="2">N (%)
width="124" rowspan="3">p-value
Mode of feeding
Breast feed
width="126">Formula feed
Diarrhea
width="124" valign="top">No
width="124">42 (84.0)
width="126">12 (24.0)
width="124" rowspan="2">0.029
Yes
width="124">8 (16.0)
width="126">38 (76.0)
Dehydration
width="124" valign="top">No
width="124">46 (92.0)
width="126">7 (14.0)
width="124" rowspan="2">0.016
Yes
width="124">4 (8.0)
width="126">43 (86.0)
Urination
width="124" valign="top">1 to 3 times
width="124">43 (86.0)
width="126">3 (6.0)
width="124" rowspan="3">0.036
4 to 6 times
width="124">1 (2.0)
width="126">11 (22.0)
More than 6 times
width="124">6 (12.0)
width="126">36 (72.0)
Sweating
width="124" valign="top">No
width="124">49 (98.0)
width="126">3 (6.0)
width="124" rowspan="2">0.053
Yes
width="124">1 (2.0)
width="126">47 (94.0)
Tears
width="124" valign="top">No
width="124">49 (98.0)
width="126">3 (6.0)
width="124" rowspan="2">0.067
Yes
width="124">1 (2.0)
width="126">47 (94.0)
Frequency of diarrhea
width="124" valign="top">1 to 3 times
width="124">43 (86.0)
width="126">3 (6.0)
width="124" rowspan="3">0.025
4 to 6 times
width="124">4 (8.0)
width="126">7 (14.0)
More than 6 times
width="124">3 (6.0)
width="126">40 (80.0)
Days of diarrhea
width="124" valign="top">1 to 3 days
width="124">33 (66.0)
width="126">11 (22.0)
width="124" rowspan="3">0.039
4 to 6 days
width="124">8 (16.0)
width="126">13 (26.0)
More than 6 days
width="124">9 (18.0)
width="126">26 (52.0)
Breastfeeding PRACTICES in relation to the Nutritional Status of the Breast Fed Child>Table 4 shows breastfeeding practises in relation to the nutritional status of a breastfed child. In relation to the nutritional status of the breastfed child, a significant difference (p0.05) was found for the first food after birth, initiation of breast milk, duration of breast milk, reason for stopping breast fed, and mother awareness regarding breast feeding.>These findings of the study strongly correlate with the findings of (Cohen et al., 1994) who conducted a study in Honduras called Effects of age of introduction of complementary foods on infant breast milk intake, total energy intake, and growth: a randomised intervention study and found a significant relationship between the first food being introduced to a newly born child and their nutritional status. If the child is given breast milk after birth, the child will most likely have a healthy nutritional status. (Suzely et al., 2008) found that the introduction of a first food has a significant impact on the nutritional status of a breastfed child.
>Table 4. Breast Feeding Practices in Relation to Nutritional Status of Breastfed Child border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0">
Variable
width="240" colspan="3">N (%)
width="58" rowspan="3">p-value
Nutritional status of breast fed child
Normal
width="84">Overweight
width="78">Underweight
First food after birth
width="114" valign="top">Breast milk
width="78">35 (97.2)
width="84">7 (77.8)
width="78">5 (100)
width="58" rowspan="2">0.015
Green tea
width="78">1 (2.8)
width="84">2 (22.2)
width="78">0 (0)
Initiation of breast milk
width="114" valign="top">1st hour
width="78">32 (88.9)
width="84">5 (55.6)
width="78">3 (60.0)
width="58" rowspan="3">0.039
2nd hour
width="78">3 (8.3)
width="84">4 (44.4)
width="78">2 (40.0)
Late
width="78">1 (8.2)
width="84">0 (0)
width="78">0 (0)
Duration of breast milk
width="114" valign="top">1 to 3 time
width="78">3 (8.3)
width="84">2 (22.2)
width="78">0 (0)
width="58" rowspan="3">0.014
4 to 6 times
width="78">28 (77.8)
width="84">7 (77.8)
width="78">3 (60.0)
More than 6 time
width="78">5 (13.9)
width="84">0 (0)
width="78">2 (40.0)
Breast milk
width="114" valign="top">1 to 3 months
width="78">3 (8.3)
width="84">0 (0)
width="78">1 (20.0)
width="58" rowspan="3">0.009
4 to 6 months
width="78">14 (38.9)
width="84">3 (33.3)
width="78">2 (40.0)
After 6 months
width="78">19 (52.8)
width="84">7 (77.6)
width="78">2 (40.0)
Reason of stopping
width="114" valign="top">Insufficient milk
width="78">11 (30.6)
width="84">1 (11.1)
width="78">2 (40.0)
width="58" rowspan="3">0.320
Mother illness
width="78">23 (63.9)
width="84">8 (88.9)
width="78">2 (40.0)
No reason
width="78">2 (5.6)
width="84">0 (0)
width="78">1 (20.0)
Mother awareness
width="114" valign="top">Friends
width="78">29 (80.6)
width="84">5 (55.6)
width="78">3 (60.0)
width="58" rowspan="4">0.012
Others
width="78">4 (11.1)
width="84">0 (0)
width="78">1 (20.0)
Tv shows
width="78">3 (8.3)
width="84">3 (33.3)
width="78">1 (20.0)
Not aware
width="78">0 (0)
width="84">1 (11.1)
width="78">0 (0)
Bottle Feeding Practices in Relation to Nutrition Status of Bottle Feed Child >Table 5 shows bottle feeding practises in relation to the nutritional status of bottle-fed children. The dilution of bottle feed and the duration of bottle feed had a significant difference (p0.05) in relation to the nutritional status of Bottle fed subjects.>The study's findings are similar to those of (Al- Nahedh et al., 1994), who discovered a significant relationship between the dilution of bottle feeding and its effect on the nutritional status of the child. (Greiner et al. 1981) concluded that there is a significant relationship between bottle feeding dilution and the nutritional status of the child.
>Table 6. Bottle Feeding Practices in Relation to the Nutrition Status of Bottle Feed Subjects border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0">
Variable
width="264" colspan="3">N (%)
width="58" rowspan="3">p-value
Nutritional status of breast fed child
Normal
width="90">Overweight
width="84">Underweight
Type of botte feed
width="108" valign="top">Cow/goat
width="90">36 (100)
width="90">9 (100)
width="84">5 (100)
width="58" rowspan="2">***
Formula
width="90">0 (0)
width="90">0 (0)
width="84">0 (0)
Dilution
width="108" valign="top">Improper
width="90">4 (11.1)
width="90">1 (11.1)
width="84">1 (20.0)
width="58" rowspan="2">0.045
Proper
width="90">32 (88.9)
width="90">8 (88.9)
width="84">4 (80.0)
Amount of bottle feed
width="108" valign="top">1 to 3 times
width="90">33 (91.7)
width="90">8 (88.9)
width="84">5 (100)
width="58" rowspan="3">0.032
4 to 6 times
width="90">2 (5.6)
width="90">0 (0)
width="84">0 (0)
More than 6 times
width="90">1 (2.8)
width="90">1 (11.1)
width="84">0 (0)
Sterilization
width="108" valign="top">5 min
width="90">29 (89.6)
width="90">9 (100)
width="84">5 (100)
width="58" rowspan="3">0.531
Less than 5 min
width="90">5 (13.9)
width="90">0 (0)
width="84">0 (0)
Never
width="90">2 (5.6)
width="90">0 (0)
width="84">0 (0)
Complementary Feeding Practices in Relation to Nutrition Status of Breast Feed Subjects>Table 7 shows the effect of complementary feeding on the nutritional status of breast-fed subjects. In relation to the nutritional status of the breastfed subject, there was a significant difference (p0.05) in the age of complementary food and use of boiled water. >The study's findings are consistent with the findings of (WHO. 2003), who stated that the earlier complementary foods are introduced to children, the better their nutritional status will be. (Wamani et al. 2002) has also discovered a link between complementary foods and children's nutritional status. (Meshram et al. 2012) conducted a study on the Impact of feeding and breastfeeding practises on the nutritional status of infants in an Andhra Pradesh district, India, and discovered a significant relationship between the start of complementary feeding and its effect on the nutritional status of the child.
Table 7. Complementary Feeding in Relation to the Nutrition Status of Breastfed Child
| Variables width="249" colspan="3">N (%) width="74" rowspan="3">p-value | > Nutritional status of breast fed child | > Normal width="78">Overweight width="85">Underweight | > Age of complementary feeding width="89" valign="top">1 to 3 months width="85">0 (0) width="78">0 (0) width="85">0 (0) width="74" rowspan="3">0.012 | > 4 to 6 months width="85">21 (58.3) width="78">3 (33.3) width="85">4 (80.0) | > After 6 months width="85">15 (41.7) width="78">6 (66.7) width="85">1 (20.0) | > Source of water width="89" valign="top">Government width="85">25 (69.4) width="78">6 (66.7) width="85">3 (60.0) width="74" rowspan="2">0.910 | > Hand pump width="85">11 (30.6) width="78">3 (33.3) width="85">2 (40.0) | > Boiled water width="89" valign="top">No width="85">5 (13.9) width="78">2 (22.2) width="85">0 (0) width="74" rowspan="2">0.017 | > Yes width="85">31 (86.1) width="78">7 (77.8) width="85">5 (100) | |||
Test applied= chi square test (descriptive statistics)
Conclusion
The current study concluded that majority of the breast feed subjects were normal whereas most of the formula feed subject were underweight according to BMI for percentile of the subjects. Furthermore the current study concluded with a significant difference (p<0.05) for the diarrhea, dehydration, urination, frequency of diarrhea, days of diarrhea, first food after birth, initiation of breast milk, duration of breast milk, reasons or stopping breast feeding, mother awareness regarding breast feeding practices, dilution and duration of bottle feeding, using of boiled water and immunization status in relation to the nutritional status of the breast feed subjects.
Recommendations
The current study concluded with the following few useful recommendation
• Breast milk should be initiated to the newly born child in the very hour of birth.
• The child should be exclusively breast feed up to 6 months of birth
• The child should be breast feed every after 15 minutes up to more than 6 times a days
• Bottle feeding can be initiated to the child after 6 months of age
• Bottle feeding should be properly diluted and sterilized up to 5 min before feeding the child.
• Complementary feedings should be started after 12 months of age.
• The raw water should be properly boiled before giving it to your child.
• Furthermore nutrition related conference should be launched in order to educate the mother regarding exclusive breast feeding and its advantages.
References
- Ajao, K. O., Ojofeitimi, E. O., Adebayo, A. A., Fatusi, A. O and Afolabi, O. T.
- Almroth, S. G.
- Al-Nahedh, N. N., & Morley, D. C.
- Arenz, S., Rückerl, R., Koletzko, B., & von Kries, R. (2004). Breast-feeding and childhood obesity - a systematic review.
- Balmer, S. E., & Wharton, B. A.
- Becquet, R., Leroy, V., Ekouevi, D. K., Viho, I., Castetbon, K., & Fassinou, P. (2006). ANRS 1201/1202 Ditrame Plus Study Group..
- Bhavsar, S., Hemant, M., & Kulkarni, R. “(2012). Maternal and environmental factors affecting the nutritional status of children in Mumbai urban slum.” International J Scientific and Research Publications, 2, 11-4
- Bhavsar, S., Hemant, M., & Kulkarni, R.
Cite this article
-
APA : Wisal, S., Ullah, I., & Saifullah. (2021). Nutritional Status of Breast Fed and Formula Fed Children: A Comparative Study. Global Drug Design & Development Review, VI(III), 43-52. https://doi.org/10.31703/gdddr.2021(VI-III).05
-
CHICAGO : Wisal, Shakoor, Ikram Ullah, and Saifullah. 2021. "Nutritional Status of Breast Fed and Formula Fed Children: A Comparative Study." Global Drug Design & Development Review, VI (III): 43-52 doi: 10.31703/gdddr.2021(VI-III).05
-
HARVARD : WISAL, S., ULLAH, I. & SAIFULLAH. 2021. Nutritional Status of Breast Fed and Formula Fed Children: A Comparative Study. Global Drug Design & Development Review, VI, 43-52.
-
MHRA : Wisal, Shakoor, Ikram Ullah, and Saifullah. 2021. "Nutritional Status of Breast Fed and Formula Fed Children: A Comparative Study." Global Drug Design & Development Review, VI: 43-52
-
MLA : Wisal, Shakoor, Ikram Ullah, and Saifullah. "Nutritional Status of Breast Fed and Formula Fed Children: A Comparative Study." Global Drug Design & Development Review, VI.III (2021): 43-52 Print.
-
OXFORD : Wisal, Shakoor, Ullah, Ikram, and Saifullah, (2021), "Nutritional Status of Breast Fed and Formula Fed Children: A Comparative Study", Global Drug Design & Development Review, VI (III), 43-52
-
TURABIAN : Wisal, Shakoor, Ikram Ullah, and Saifullah. "Nutritional Status of Breast Fed and Formula Fed Children: A Comparative Study." Global Drug Design & Development Review VI, no. III (2021): 43-52. https://doi.org/10.31703/gdddr.2021(VI-III).05