A Comparison Of Radial Versus Femoral Approach In Primary Percutaneous Coronary Interventions
Most interventional cardiologists choose the femoral route for non-compulsory and number one PCI (PCI). Transradial access is gaining popularity due to less issues at the entrance location. 100 patients with acute ST-phase elevation myocardial infarction were recruited in the study. The researcher divided the study population in 1/2, assigning 1/2 of Group A to patients whose first PCI was performed using the transfemoral route and 1/2 of Group B to transradial route patients. Comparing groups' problems. Major and small hematomas, bleeding difficulties, pseudoaneurysm of the femoral artery, and lack of radial artery have been visible in each group, even though the distinction become now no longer statistically significant. First, primary angioplasty may be performed transfemoral or transradial; second, there is no difference in complication rates between the femoral and radial techniques for patients with acute myocardial infarction undergoing first PCI; and third, the operator must utilise the method that is learned.
-
Myocardial Infarction, Radial Access, Percutaneous Coronary Procedures, and Coronary Angiography
-
(1) Qazi Najeeb Ullah Amin
MBBS, FCPS Cardiology, Specialty Cardiology, Hayatabad Medical Comple, Peshawar, KP, Pakistan.
(2) Irfan Ali Khan
MBBS, FCPS Cardiology, Specialty Cardiology, Hayatabad Medical Comple, Peshawar, KP, Pakistan.
(3) Kashif Ullah Shah
MBBS, FCPS Cardiology, Specialty Cardiology, Hayatabad Medical Comple, Peshawar, KP, Pakistan.
(4) Zia Ur Rehman
MBBS, FCPS Cardiology, Specialty Cardiology, Hayatabad Medical Comple, Peshawar, KP, Pakistan.
(5) Farman Ullah
MBBS, FCPS Cardiology, Specialty Cardiology, Hayatabad Medical Comple, Peshawar, KP, Pakistan.
(6) Sami Ullah
MBBS, FCPS Cardiology, Specialty Cardiology, Hayatabad Medical Comple, Peshawar, KP, Pakistan.
- Bhat FA, Changal KH, Raina H, et al. (2017). Transradial versus transfemoral approach for coronary angiography and angioplasty—a prospective, randomized comparison. BMC Cardiovasc Disord 2017; 17:23. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12872-016-0457-2
- Bouchahda, N., Ben Abdessalem, M. A., Ben Hlima, N., Ben Messaoud, M., Denguir, H., Boussaada, M. M., Saoudi, W., Jamel, A., Hassine, M., Bouraoui, H., Mahjoub, M., Mahdhaoui, A., Jeridi, G., Betbout, F., & Gamra, H. (2023). Combination Therapy With Nicardipine and Isosorbide Dinitrate to Prevent Spasm in Transradial Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (from the NISTRA Multicenter Double-Blind Randomized Controlled Trial). The American Journal of Cardiology, 188, 89–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjcard.2022.11.005
- Choi, S. H., Park, S. D., Lee, M. J., & Lee, K. J. (2022). Comparison of trans-radial access and femoral access in cardiogenic shock patient who had undergone primary percutaneous coronary intervention from SMART RESCUE trial. European Heart Journal, 43(Supplement_2). https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehac544.1246
- De Caterina, R., Agewall, S., Andreotti, F., Angiolillo, D. J., Bhatt, D. L., Byrne, R. A., & Galli, M. (2022). Great Debate: Triple antithrombotic therapy in patients with atrial fibrillation undergoing coronary stenting should be limited to 1 week. European Heart Journal, 43(37), 3512-3527. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehac294
- Gargiulo, G., Giacoppo, D., Jolly, S. S., Cairns, J., Le May, M., Bernat, I., Romagnoli, E., Rao, S. V., van Leeuwen, M. A., Mehta, S. R., Bertrand, O. F., Wells, G. A., Meijers, T. A., Siontis, G. C., Esposito, G., Windecker, S., Jüni, P., & Valgimigli, M. (2022). Effects on Mortality and Major Bleeding of Radial Versus Femoral Artery Access for Coronary Angiography or Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Meta-Analysis of Individual Patient Data From 7 Multicenter Randomized Clinical Trials. C https://doi.org/10.1161/circulationaha.122.061527
- Gladden, J. D., Gulati, R., & Sandoval, Y. (2022). Contemporary Techniques for Femoral and Radial Arterial Access in the Cardiac Catheterization Laboratory. Reviews in Cardiovascular Medicine, 23(9), 316.
- Gwefel, A., Louis, O., & Yassin, I. (2022). Comparison of the Renal Function Using Two Different Approaches for Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Retrospective Cohort Study. Cardiol Vasc Res, 6(4), 1-8.
- Hannan, E. L., Zhong, Y., Ling, F. S., LeMay, M., Jacobs, A. K., King, S. B., Berger, P. B., Venditti, F. J., Walford, G., & Tamis-Holland, J. (2022). Relation of Operator Volume and Access Site to Short-Term Mortality in Radial Versus Femoral Access for Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention. The American Journal of Cardiology, 176, 30–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjcard.2022.04.025
- Kumar, R., Kumar K, Kane G, et al. Comparative study of trans radial versus trans femoral route in acute STEMI. IOSR Journal of Dental and Medical Sciences(IOSR-JDMS) 2019; 18, 61–69.
- Mori, H., Sakurai, K., Ikari, Y., Fukui, K., Maeda, A., Akashi, Y., ... & Suzuki, H. (2022). Radial versus femoral access in patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention for ST-elevation myocardial infarction: A propensity-matched analysis from real-world data of the K-ACTIVE registry. Journal of Cardiology.
- Naini, P. T., Jamalian, M., Riahi, A., Roohafza, H. R., Shafiei, M., Agharazi, M., & Sadeghi, M. (2022). Long-term hospital readmission after ST-elevation myocardial infarction: A three- year follow-up from SEMI-CI study. The Journal of Tehran University Heart Center.
- Piątek, U., Piątek, K., Kurzawski, J., Sadowski, M., Malinowski, K., Cecha, P., Bartuś, S., &Siudak, Z. (2022). Predictors and periprocedural outcomes of access crossover during primary percutaneous coronary interventions — a contemporary report from the Polish ORPKI registry. Kardiologia Polska, 80(7–8), 799–805. https://doi.org/10.33963/kp.a2022.0121
- Piedimonte, G., Bertagnin, E., Castellana, C., Ferrarotto, L., Mangione, R., Venuti, G., Valvo, R., Scalia, M., Capodanno, D., Tamburino, C., & La Manna, A. (2022). Ultrasound- Versus Fluoroscopy-Guided Femoral Access for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention of Chronic Total Occlusions: Insights From FOUND BLOOD CTO Registry. Cardiovascular Revascularization Medicine, 38, 61–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carrev.2021.08.024
- SaaB, F., & Md, F. (2030). TAMI: A New Technique in Critical Limb Ischemia Revascularization.
- Sattar, Y., Talib, U., Faisaluddin, M., Song, D., Lak, H. M., Laghari, A., ... & Alam, M. (2022). Meta-analysis comparing distal radial versus traditional radial percutaneous coronary intervention or angiography. The American Journal of Cardiology, 170, 31-39.
- Savage, M., Hay, K., Murdoch, D., Walters, D. L., Denman, R., Ranasinghe, I., & Raffel, C. (2022). Sex differences in time to primary percutaneous coronary intervention and outcomes in patients presenting with ST- segment elevation myocardial infarction. Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions, 100(4), 520–529. https://doi.org/10.1002/ccd.30357
- Senguttuvan, N. B., Reddy, P. M., Shankar, P., Abdulkader, R. S., Yallanki, H. P., Kumar, A., & Bahl, V. K. (2022). Trans-radial approach versus trans-femoral approach in patients with acute coronary syndrome undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: An updated meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Plos one, 17(4), e0266709. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0266709
- Tokarek, T., Dziewierz, A., Plens, K., Rakowski, T., Januszek, R., Zabojszcz, M., Janion- Sadowska, A., Dudek, D., & Siudak, Z. (2022). Comparison of safety and effectiveness between the right and left radial artery approach in percutaneous coronary intervention. Revista Españ ola De Cardiologà a (English Edition), 75(2), 119–128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rec.2020.09.019
- TORKEY, E. M., MOHAMED, I. S., AMR, M., MOHAMMAD, A. S., ELWANY, M., & MOSTAFA, N. (2022). Radial versus Femoral Approach for STEMI Patients Undergoing Primary or Rescue PCI: Alexandria University Experience. The Medical Journal of Cairo University, 90(6), 1085– 1091. https://doi.org/10.21608/mjcu.2022.257379
- Ueki, Y., Zanchin, T., Losdat, S., Karagiannis, A., Otsuka, T., Siontis, G. C. M., Häner, J., Stortecky, S., Pilgrim, T., Valgimigli, M., Windecker, S., & Räber, L. (2022). Self- reported non-adherence to P2Y12 inhibitors in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: Application of the medication non-adherence academic research consortium classification. PLOS ONE, 17(2), e0263180. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0263180
Cite this article
-
APA : Amin, Q. N. U., Khan, I. A., & Shah, K. U. (2022). A Comparison Of Radial Versus Femoral Approach In Primary Percutaneous Coronary Interventions. Global Drug Design & Development Review, VII(I), 33-39. https://doi.org/10.31703/gdddr.2022(VII-I).05
-
CHICAGO : Amin, Qazi Najeeb Ullah, Irfan Ali Khan, and Kashif Ullah Shah. 2022. "A Comparison Of Radial Versus Femoral Approach In Primary Percutaneous Coronary Interventions." Global Drug Design & Development Review, VII (I): 33-39 doi: 10.31703/gdddr.2022(VII-I).05
-
HARVARD : AMIN, Q. N. U., KHAN, I. A. & SHAH, K. U. 2022. A Comparison Of Radial Versus Femoral Approach In Primary Percutaneous Coronary Interventions. Global Drug Design & Development Review, VII, 33-39.
-
MHRA : Amin, Qazi Najeeb Ullah, Irfan Ali Khan, and Kashif Ullah Shah. 2022. "A Comparison Of Radial Versus Femoral Approach In Primary Percutaneous Coronary Interventions." Global Drug Design & Development Review, VII: 33-39
-
MLA : Amin, Qazi Najeeb Ullah, Irfan Ali Khan, and Kashif Ullah Shah. "A Comparison Of Radial Versus Femoral Approach In Primary Percutaneous Coronary Interventions." Global Drug Design & Development Review, VII.I (2022): 33-39 Print.
-
OXFORD : Amin, Qazi Najeeb Ullah, Khan, Irfan Ali, and Shah, Kashif Ullah (2022), "A Comparison Of Radial Versus Femoral Approach In Primary Percutaneous Coronary Interventions", Global Drug Design & Development Review, VII (I), 33-39
-
TURABIAN : Amin, Qazi Najeeb Ullah, Irfan Ali Khan, and Kashif Ullah Shah. "A Comparison Of Radial Versus Femoral Approach In Primary Percutaneous Coronary Interventions." Global Drug Design & Development Review VII, no. I (2022): 33-39. https://doi.org/10.31703/gdddr.2022(VII-I).05