PEDICULAR SCREW INSTRUMENTATION OUTCOME IN POSTERIOR SPINAL FUSION OF ADOLESCENT IDIOPATHIC SCOLIOSIS

http://dx.doi.org/10.31703/gdddr.2022(VII-II).07      10.31703/gdddr.2022(VII-II).07      Published : Jun 2
Authored by : Muhammad Naeem , Muhammad Jamil , Noor Ul Islam , Muhammad Ayaz Khan , Neelab , Qaiser Alam

07 Pages : 52 -58

References

  • Agata, E., Raya, J., & Bago, J. (2017). Introversion the prevalent trait of adolescents with idiopathic scoliosis: an observational study. Scoliosis and Spinal Disorders, 12(27), https://doi.org/10.1186/s13013-017-0136-9
  • Anekstein,Y., Mirovsky, Y., & Arnabitsky, V. (2012). Rever sing the concept: correction of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis using the convex rod de-rotation maneuver. Eur Spine J, 21, 1942–1949. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-012-2355-3
  • Azimifar, F., Hassani, K., Saveh, A. H., & Ghomsheh, F. T. (2017). A medium invasiveness multi-level patient’s specific template for pedicle screw placement in the scoliosis surgery. BioMedical Engineering Online. 5, 130. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12938-017-0421-0
  • Basu, S., Rathinavelu, S., Baid, P. (2010). Posterior scoliosis correction for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis using side-opening pedicle screw-rod system utilizing the axial translation technique. Indian J Orthop, 44(1), 42–49. https://doi.org/10.4103/0019-5413.58605
  • Cheng, K. M., & Gupta, C. (2003). Pical sublaminarwires versus pedicle screws— which provides better results forsurgical correction of adolescent idiopathic scoliosisSpine, 30(18), 2104. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.brs.0000179261.70845.b7
  • Csernátony, Z., Kiss, L., Manó, S., & Hunya, Z. (2013). Our experience and early results with a complementary implant for the correction of major thoracic curves. Eur Spine J. 22(6), 1286. ttps://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-013-2698-4
  • Gao, T., Lai, Q., & Zhou, S. (2017). Correlation between facet tropism and lumbar degenerative disease: a retrospective analysis. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, 18(483), https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-017-1849-x
  • Gauzy, J., Jouve, L., Accadbled, A., Blondel, B., & Bollini, G. (2011). Use of the universal clamp in adolescent idiopathicscoliosis for deformity correction and as an adjunct to fusion: 2-year follow-up. Journal of Children’s Orthopedics, 5(4), 273. Https://doi.org/10.1007/s11832-011-0357-z
  • Ghanem, I. B., Hagnere, F., Dubousset, J. F., Watier, B., Skalli, W., & Lavaste, F. (1997). Intraoperative electronic analysis of three- dimensional vertebral displacement aftercotrel-dubousset rod rotation , a preliminary report.Spine. https://doi.org/1997;22:1913.
  • Hassankhani, E. G., Kashani, O. F., Moradkhani, S., Hassankhani, G. G., & Shakeri, M. T. (2016). Comparison of clinical and radiologic outcome of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis treated with posterior instrumentation. Adv in Med, 4(05). https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/7639727
  • Helenius, I., Remes, V., Yrjonen, T., Ylikoski, M., Schlenzka, D., Helenius, M., & Poussa, M. (2003). Harrington and Cotrel-Dubousset instrumentation in adolescent diopathic scoliosis. Long-term functional and radiographic outcomes. JBone Joint Surg Am. 85, 2303. https://doi.org/10.2106/00004623-200312000-00006
  • Ilharreborde, B., Even, J., & Lefevre, Y. (2010). Hybrid constructs fortridimensional correction of the thoracic spine in adolescentidiopathic scoliosis: a comparative analysis of universal clampsversus hooks. Spine, 35, 306. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181b7c7c4
  • Kim, J., Lenke, G., & Kim, L. (2006). Comparative analysis ofpedicle screw versus hybrid instrumentation in posterior spinalfusion of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine, 31(3), 291. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.brs.0000197865.20803.d4
  • Kim, Y. J., Bridwell, K. H., Lenke, L. G., Kim, J., Cho, S. K. (2005). Proximal junctionalmeasurement in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis following segmental posterior spinal instrumentation and fusion: minimum 5-year follow-up. Spine, 30(18), 2045. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.brs.0000179084.45839.ad
  • Konieczny, M. R., Senyurt, H., & Krauspe, R. (2013). Epidemiology of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Journal of Children’s Orthopaedics; 7(1), 3. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11832-012-0457-4
  • Lowenstein, J., Matsumoto, H., & Vitale, M. (2007). Coronaland sagittal plane correction in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis:a comparison between all pedicle screw versus hybrid thoracichook lumbar screw constructs. Spine, 32, 448. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.brs.0000255030.78293.fd
  • Åžarlak, A. Y., Atmaca, H., Buluç, L., Tosun, B., & MusaoÄŸlu, B. (2009). Juvenile idiopathic scoliosis treated with posterior arthrodesis and segmental pedicle screw instrumentation before the age of 9 years: a 5-year follow-up. Scoliosis, 4(1), https://doi.org/10.1186/1748-7161-4-1

References

  • Agata, E., Raya, J., & Bago, J. (2017). Introversion the prevalent trait of adolescents with idiopathic scoliosis: an observational study. Scoliosis and Spinal Disorders, 12(27), https://doi.org/10.1186/s13013-017-0136-9
  • Anekstein,Y., Mirovsky, Y., & Arnabitsky, V. (2012). Rever sing the concept: correction of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis using the convex rod de-rotation maneuver. Eur Spine J, 21, 1942–1949. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-012-2355-3
  • Azimifar, F., Hassani, K., Saveh, A. H., & Ghomsheh, F. T. (2017). A medium invasiveness multi-level patient’s specific template for pedicle screw placement in the scoliosis surgery. BioMedical Engineering Online. 5, 130. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12938-017-0421-0
  • Basu, S., Rathinavelu, S., Baid, P. (2010). Posterior scoliosis correction for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis using side-opening pedicle screw-rod system utilizing the axial translation technique. Indian J Orthop, 44(1), 42–49. https://doi.org/10.4103/0019-5413.58605
  • Cheng, K. M., & Gupta, C. (2003). Pical sublaminarwires versus pedicle screws— which provides better results forsurgical correction of adolescent idiopathic scoliosisSpine, 30(18), 2104. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.brs.0000179261.70845.b7
  • Csernátony, Z., Kiss, L., Manó, S., & Hunya, Z. (2013). Our experience and early results with a complementary implant for the correction of major thoracic curves. Eur Spine J. 22(6), 1286. ttps://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-013-2698-4
  • Gao, T., Lai, Q., & Zhou, S. (2017). Correlation between facet tropism and lumbar degenerative disease: a retrospective analysis. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, 18(483), https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-017-1849-x
  • Gauzy, J., Jouve, L., Accadbled, A., Blondel, B., & Bollini, G. (2011). Use of the universal clamp in adolescent idiopathicscoliosis for deformity correction and as an adjunct to fusion: 2-year follow-up. Journal of Children’s Orthopedics, 5(4), 273. Https://doi.org/10.1007/s11832-011-0357-z
  • Ghanem, I. B., Hagnere, F., Dubousset, J. F., Watier, B., Skalli, W., & Lavaste, F. (1997). Intraoperative electronic analysis of three- dimensional vertebral displacement aftercotrel-dubousset rod rotation , a preliminary report.Spine. https://doi.org/1997;22:1913.
  • Hassankhani, E. G., Kashani, O. F., Moradkhani, S., Hassankhani, G. G., & Shakeri, M. T. (2016). Comparison of clinical and radiologic outcome of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis treated with posterior instrumentation. Adv in Med, 4(05). https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/7639727
  • Helenius, I., Remes, V., Yrjonen, T., Ylikoski, M., Schlenzka, D., Helenius, M., & Poussa, M. (2003). Harrington and Cotrel-Dubousset instrumentation in adolescent diopathic scoliosis. Long-term functional and radiographic outcomes. JBone Joint Surg Am. 85, 2303. https://doi.org/10.2106/00004623-200312000-00006
  • Ilharreborde, B., Even, J., & Lefevre, Y. (2010). Hybrid constructs fortridimensional correction of the thoracic spine in adolescentidiopathic scoliosis: a comparative analysis of universal clampsversus hooks. Spine, 35, 306. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181b7c7c4
  • Kim, J., Lenke, G., & Kim, L. (2006). Comparative analysis ofpedicle screw versus hybrid instrumentation in posterior spinalfusion of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine, 31(3), 291. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.brs.0000197865.20803.d4
  • Kim, Y. J., Bridwell, K. H., Lenke, L. G., Kim, J., Cho, S. K. (2005). Proximal junctionalmeasurement in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis following segmental posterior spinal instrumentation and fusion: minimum 5-year follow-up. Spine, 30(18), 2045. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.brs.0000179084.45839.ad
  • Konieczny, M. R., Senyurt, H., & Krauspe, R. (2013). Epidemiology of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Journal of Children’s Orthopaedics; 7(1), 3. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11832-012-0457-4
  • Lowenstein, J., Matsumoto, H., & Vitale, M. (2007). Coronaland sagittal plane correction in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis:a comparison between all pedicle screw versus hybrid thoracichook lumbar screw constructs. Spine, 32, 448. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.brs.0000255030.78293.fd
  • Åžarlak, A. Y., Atmaca, H., Buluç, L., Tosun, B., & MusaoÄŸlu, B. (2009). Juvenile idiopathic scoliosis treated with posterior arthrodesis and segmental pedicle screw instrumentation before the age of 9 years: a 5-year follow-up. Scoliosis, 4(1), https://doi.org/10.1186/1748-7161-4-1

Cite this article

APA

    APA : Naeem, M., Jamil, M., & Islam, N. U. (2022). Pedicular Screw Instrumentation Outcome in Posterior Spinal Fusion of Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis. Global Drug Design & Development Review, VII(II), 52 -58. https://doi.org/10.31703/gdddr.2022(VII-II).07

CHICAGO

    CHICAGO : Naeem, Muhammad, Muhammad Jamil, and Noor Ul Islam. 2022. "Pedicular Screw Instrumentation Outcome in Posterior Spinal Fusion of Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis." Global Drug Design & Development Review, VII (II): 52 -58 doi: 10.31703/gdddr.2022(VII-II).07

HARVARD

    HARVARD : NAEEM, M., JAMIL, M. & ISLAM, N. U. 2022. Pedicular Screw Instrumentation Outcome in Posterior Spinal Fusion of Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis. Global Drug Design & Development Review, VII, 52 -58.

MHRA

    MHRA : Naeem, Muhammad, Muhammad Jamil, and Noor Ul Islam. 2022. "Pedicular Screw Instrumentation Outcome in Posterior Spinal Fusion of Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis." Global Drug Design & Development Review, VII: 52 -58

MLA

    MLA : Naeem, Muhammad, Muhammad Jamil, and Noor Ul Islam. "Pedicular Screw Instrumentation Outcome in Posterior Spinal Fusion of Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis." Global Drug Design & Development Review, VII.II (2022): 52 -58 Print.

OXFORD

    OXFORD : Naeem, Muhammad, Jamil, Muhammad, and Islam, Noor Ul (2022), "Pedicular Screw Instrumentation Outcome in Posterior Spinal Fusion of Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis", Global Drug Design & Development Review, VII (II), 52 -58

TURABIAN

    TURABIAN : Naeem, Muhammad, Muhammad Jamil, and Noor Ul Islam. "Pedicular Screw Instrumentation Outcome in Posterior Spinal Fusion of Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis." Global Drug Design & Development Review VII, no. II (2022): 52 -58. https://doi.org/10.31703/gdddr.2022(VII-II).07